WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Singapore Airlines: 1 dead, others injured after London
Toyota racks up booming profit, vows to invest to keep growth going
Western Hemisphere nations pledge to continue coordinating response to historic regional migration
Chinese economy to provide more opportunities for cooperation
Tennessee latest state to mandate automatic defibrillators at high schools
Dua Lipa puts on sultry show in silk and lace as she teams a plunging corset with low
Proposed $2.77 billion settlement clears first step of NCAA approval with no change to finance plan
Over 10 casualties reported in SW China attack
Pogacar extends Giro lead to over 7 minutes after winning altered Stage 16 amid protests at start
Toyota racks up booming profit, vows to invest to keep growth going